DataEntryID 99 General information Manuscript title: A model of yeast glycolysis based on a consistent kinetic characterisation of all its enzymes. PubMed ID: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23831062 Journal: FEBS Letters Year: 2013 Authors: Kieran Smallbone, Hanan L. Messiha, Kathleen M. Carroll, Catherine L. Winder, Naglis Malys, Warwick B. Dunn, Ettore Murabito, Neil Swainston, Joseph O. Dada, Farid Khan, Pınar Pir, Evangelos Simeonidis, Irena Spasić, Jill Wishart, Dieter Weichart, Neil W. Hayes, Daniel Jameson, David S. Broomhead, Stephen G. Oliver, Simon J. Gaskell, John E.G. McCarthy, Norman W. Paton, Hans V. Westerhoff, Douglas B. Kell, Pedro Mendes Affiliations: Manchester Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, UK Keywords: Glycolysis, Systems biology, Enzyme kinetic, Isoenzyme, Modelling Full text article: https://www.kimosys.org/rails/active_storage/blobs/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsibWVzc2FnZSI6IkJBaHBBcjRFIiwiZXhwIjpudWxsLCJwdXIiOiJibG9iX2lkIn19--83aa95be6c5b8986eda3d15002240aa59b0cfd4b/Smallbone_2013.pdf Project name: — Experiment description Organism: Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain: Y23925 Data type: metabolites at steady-state Data units: molecules/cell Execution date: not specified Experimental details Temperature (°C): not specified pH: not specified Carbon source: glucose Culture mode: chemostat Process condition: aerobic Dilution rate (h⁻¹): µmax Working volume: not specified L Biomass concentration (g/L): monitored by measuring the electrical capacitance of the culture. Medium composition: not specified General protocol information: Sampling Method: 10 ml of culture.; Quenching: 10 ml of culture solution into 40 ml of a 60:40 methanol/water solution [1] stored at a temperature of −47 °C [2]. Immediate separation of cells was performed by applying centrifugation (4000 g for 5 min) followed by removal of the quenching solution. ; Extraction list: freezing-thawing in methanol, methanol-water; Analysis list: GC-MS, LC-MS; Methods description: Samples were analysed using two analytical platforms. Fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphate was quantified applying ultra-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (UPLC‐MS) (Waters Acquity UPLC coupled to a ThermoFisher hybrid electrospray LTQ‐Orbitrap mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, http://www.thermofisher.com/)) and the standard addition method for accurate quantification. Other metabolites were quantified applying GC–MS (Agilent 6890 Gas Chromatograph coupled to a Leco Pegasus III electron impact‐time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer (Leco, http://www.leco.com/)) and the external calibration method for accurate quantification. The concentrations determined in the extracted samples were reported as the number of molecules per cell. The gas chromatographic separation of 2‐phosphoglycerate and 3‐phosphoglycerate is technically demanding and was not achieved during this study. Therefore, the combined concentration of both metabolites was reported rather than separate concentrations for each metabolite. Concentrations were calculated relative to an effective cytoplasmic volume of 5 fl. -----------------References-------------------- [1] W.B. Dunn , C.L. Winder. Methods Enzymol., 500, (2011), 277– 297. http://doi.org/dfwnv3 [2] M. Martins , W. Sha , C. Evans , S. Martino-Catt , P. Mendes , V. Shulaev. Yeast, 24, (2007), 181– 188. http://doi.org/c2qv8f Data file: http://kimosys.org/repository/99/download?parameter=1213; Alternative formats: no files uploaded Submission and curation Entered by: Administrator KiMoSys Created: 2018-07-16 15:49:58 UTC Updated: 2020-04-24 16:10:35 UTC Version: 2 Status: (reviewed) 2018-07-16 15:57:33 UTC Views: 285 Downloads: 54